Submit a Full Paper Review
Thank you for acting as a peer reviewer for the 2025 DEFSA conference.
1 - 5 Scale Descriptions
| 1: Poor | The submission does not meet the standard expected for this criterion. It displays fundamental weaknesses, lacks relevance or coherence, and does not demonstrate sufficient scholarly engagement. |
| 2: Fair | The submission addresses the criterion in a limited or superficial manner. It lacks analytical depth, conceptual clarity, or methodological rigour, and requires substantial revision to meet academic research standards. |
| 3: Satisfactory | The submission adequately addresses the criterion. It demonstrates a reasonable level of clarity and relevance but may exhibit shortcomings in depth, originality, or critical engagement. |
| 4: Good | The submission engages with the criterion in a meaningful and well-structured manner. It reflects sound academic research practice, thoughtful analysis, and coherent argumentation, with minor areas for refinement. |
| 5: Excellent | The submission demonstrates exemplary engagement with the criterion. It is conceptually robust, methodologically sound, clearly articulated, and makes a substantive and original contribution to the field. |